Get the latest news, research, commentary and analysis on what is impacting your quality of life. From top scholars to regular citizens, this blog’s contributors make the latest in empirical research on economic freedom accessible and easy to understand, issue by issue.
“Pro-Business” or “Pro-Market”? And What’s the Difference?
Surprising as it may seem, “Pro-business” does not necessarily mean “pro-market.” In fact, many who call themselves “pro-business” actually work against the market and restrict the economic freedom upon which our prosperity depends.
Consider the following . . .
Because businesses provide jobs and make other positive contributions to communities, both “sides” agree that government should promote business. Where they differ is over how. Pro-business advocates believe the government should directly assist specific businesses or industries through subsidies, tax breaks, or other advantages. Pro-market supporters reject this. They argue that government should simply ensure a level playing field for competition.
The truth is that intervention in the marketplace harms everyone—except those directly receiving the benefits, of course. When the consumer is no longer the deciding factor in whether a business succeeds or fails, businesses direct more and more of their resources toward securing government favors and less and less on pleasing customers. Corruption and cronyism often result. And it’s always the taxpayers who end up having to pay for it all.
So, now you know—“pro-business” is not “pro-market.” One allows government officials to choose which businesses and industries get an advantage over others; one supports a fair marketplace in which all compete equally.
But in case you’re still not sure about the difference between the two, here are five ways to tell.
You know you’re “pro-business” rather than “pro-market” if you believe . . .
- government should make special tax provisions for specific industries
(pro-market position: equal tax rates for all)
- government should give out grants to individual businesses
(pro-market position: government shows no preference to individual businesses)
- government should use eminent domain to make way for private development
(pro-market position: eminent domain should never be used for private interests)
- government should make loans to businesses that can’t secure them in the private sector
(pro-market position: government should not be making loans to businesses at all)
- government should impose tariffs to protect domestic industries from global competition
(pro-market position: tariffs increase prices for consumers)
When the government supports certain companies or industries over others, the special interests unfairly benefit. Economic freedom is what can bring prosperity and opportunity to all. That’s why we must make sure we are not just “supporting business” but always upholding the virtues of the market.